Logo

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Last Updated: 23.06.2025 00:36

Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.

How does red light therapy affect eyes?

“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.

What’s next?

Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.

Denver Health sees increase in people getting MMR vaccine - 9News

Any day of the week — including Sundays.

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.

Ask Ethan: What would the Universe be like without dark matter? - Big Think

Russia can stop this any time.

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?

Gwyneth Paltrow Is Not Breaking Up With Dakota Johnson Following Chris Martin Split - The Daily Beast

Let’s just make it real clear:

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.

Liquid Glass is more than skin deep on macOS Tahoe - AppleInsider

Just in the last 5 years:

Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.

Thank you.

When did you realize that your childhood was not normal?

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?

Why are right-wing commentators spreading conspiracy theories about Haitians eating local pets in Springfield, Ohio?

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.

Why Sonics expansion talk could heat up this summer - The Seattle Times

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.

Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.

Sending ATACMS is WW3.

How can you maintain self-control?